Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 1:44:34 GMT -5
After recognizing that the collection form for the appeal deposit presented by Caixa Econômica Federal was valid, Section I Specialized in Individual Disputes, of the Superior Labor Court, guaranteed the bank the right to have an Interlocutory Appeal analyzed by the th Panel.
For the Class, the mechanical authentication of the appeal deposit slip for the review appeal was illegible, making it impossible to verify the exact amount collected by Caixa. For the board, therefore, the illegible bank authentication made it impossible to confirm the preparation of the appeal and, consequently, to examine the process.
However, in the opinion of Minister Vieira de Mello Filho, rapporteur Austria Phone Numbers List of the CEF's embargoes on SDI-, there were sufficient elements in the file attesting to the regularity of the preparation of the company's Review Appeal. For example: the form was attached indicating the receiving bank and the date of payment.
The rapporteur emphasizes that if the bank authenticated the guide, it is because the amount collected is the amount entered in the specific field of the document. This means that the partial illegibility of the form does not compromise the assessment of compliance with the requirement of due collection of the appeal deposit.
Unwilling to give up the jackpot, Banco do Brasil decided to go to Brasília to dismantle the agreement between the private competitor and TJ-RJ. The package also included the
Minas Gerais Court of Justice, where judicial deposits totaled R$ billion until two years ago. To the National Council of Justice, BB stated that private institutions could not manage deposits, since article of the Code of Civil Procedure, even with the change made by Federal Law ,/, gives preference to official banks. He obtained an injunction in , which suspended the result of the bidding and maintained the previous agreement. The Rio de Janeiro Judiciary claimed that it would lose up to R$ million. The injunction is now before the STF.
Therefore, unanimously, SDI- dismissed the declaration of irregularity in the document and ordered the case to be returned to the Panel to judge the Caixa Instrumental Appeal. With information from the TST Press Office.
For the Class, the mechanical authentication of the appeal deposit slip for the review appeal was illegible, making it impossible to verify the exact amount collected by Caixa. For the board, therefore, the illegible bank authentication made it impossible to confirm the preparation of the appeal and, consequently, to examine the process.
However, in the opinion of Minister Vieira de Mello Filho, rapporteur Austria Phone Numbers List of the CEF's embargoes on SDI-, there were sufficient elements in the file attesting to the regularity of the preparation of the company's Review Appeal. For example: the form was attached indicating the receiving bank and the date of payment.
The rapporteur emphasizes that if the bank authenticated the guide, it is because the amount collected is the amount entered in the specific field of the document. This means that the partial illegibility of the form does not compromise the assessment of compliance with the requirement of due collection of the appeal deposit.
Unwilling to give up the jackpot, Banco do Brasil decided to go to Brasília to dismantle the agreement between the private competitor and TJ-RJ. The package also included the
Minas Gerais Court of Justice, where judicial deposits totaled R$ billion until two years ago. To the National Council of Justice, BB stated that private institutions could not manage deposits, since article of the Code of Civil Procedure, even with the change made by Federal Law ,/, gives preference to official banks. He obtained an injunction in , which suspended the result of the bidding and maintained the previous agreement. The Rio de Janeiro Judiciary claimed that it would lose up to R$ million. The injunction is now before the STF.
Therefore, unanimously, SDI- dismissed the declaration of irregularity in the document and ordered the case to be returned to the Panel to judge the Caixa Instrumental Appeal. With information from the TST Press Office.